Original Article

Vol. 26 No. 6 (2015): 2015.26.6-Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology

Multidisciplinary decision making in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: A hospital-based study

Main Article Content

Saad Zaky
Nahed A. Makhlouf
Mohamed O Abdel-Malek
Ahmed A. Bakheet
Hany M. A. Seif
Hesham M. Hamza
Abeer M. M. Sabry

Abstract

Background/Aims: To evaluate the short-term outcome of the decision taken by the Hepatoma Board for the treatment of Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). <o:p></o:p>
 
Materials and Methods: This was a prospective descriptive study involving 74 patients with HCC diagnosed by the known criteria. The decisions taken by the Hepatoma Board for the 74 patients were as follows: 1- surgical resection (7 patients), 2- local ablative therapy (LAT) (22 patients), 3- conventional transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) (24 patients), and 4- palliative supportive care (21 patients). <o:p></o:p>
 
Results: The short-term mortality rate was 25.7% of the total patients. The success rate was nearly equal in LAT (68.2%) and surgery (71.4%), whereas the success rate was approximately 33.3% in TACE. There was no difference in the mean total bilirubin level before and after LAT, surgery, or TACE (p>0.05 for each). There was a significant decrease in the mean serum albumin level after TACE (p=0.000). There was a decrease in the mean alpha fetoprotein level after surgery and LAT (p=0.033) for surgery and (p=0.048) for LAT. <o:p></o:p>
 
Conclusion: The management of HCC is better performed through a multidisciplinary team decision. Surgery has comparable outcome to LAT but is more invasive. According to our local experience, conventional TACE has a success rate of 33.3%. <o:p></o:p>

Article Details

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.